CESifo Group Munich
The CESifo Group, consisting of the Center for Economic Studies (CES), the Ifo Institute and the CESifo GmbH (Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research) is a research group unique in Europe in the area of economic research. read on CESifo Group Munich
Münchner Seminar 27. Mai 2013 Professor Andreas Pautz about the Outlook for Nuclear Energy and Safety Research
How safe and sustainable is nuclear energy? These are the questions that Professor Andreas Pautz, Institute Director at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale of Lausanne, will focus on in the framework of the Munich Seminars. On Monday 27 May 2013, he is due to give a seminar entitled: “The Outlook for Nuclear Energy and Safety Research in the Context of the Energy Debate”. The seminar will be given in German in the Ludwig-Erhard-Saal of the Ifo Institute and will be livestreamed via the internet on the CESifo web site. It is scheduled to begin at 6.00 p.m. read on Professor Andreas Pautz about the Outlook for Nuclear Energy and Safety Research
Ifo Annual Meeting 2013
The 64th Annual Meeting of the Ifo Institute will take place on Wednesday, 26 June 2013, in the Grosse Aula of the Ludwig-Maximilian University of Munich.
The future of European integration depends largely on the extent to which the Monetary Union can be put on solid foundations. To contribute to a more objective public policy debate, the Ifo Annual Meeting will illuminate the scope for the development of the Monetary Union from different angles. read on Ifo Annual Meeting 2013
In Ifo Working Paper No. 162 Christian Bjornskov and Niklas Potrafke investigate empirically how party ideology influenced size and scope of government as measured by the size of government, tax structure and labor market regulation in 49 US states over the 1993-2009 period. They employ data on the ideological mapping of US legislatures that considers spatial and temporal differences in Democratic and Republican Party ideology. The main result suggests that Republican governors have been more active in deregulating labor markets. Furthermore, they find that ideology induced policies were counteracted by certain types of divided government which occurs when government has a different party affiliation than the majority of at least one of the chambers (House and Senate).
How safe and sustainable is nuclear energy? These are the questions that Professor Andreas Pautz, Institute Director at the Ecole Polytechnique Federale of Lausanne, will focus on in the framework of the Munich Seminars. On Monday 27 May 2013, he is due to give a seminar entitled: “The Outlook for Nuclear Energy and Safety Research in the Context of the Energy Debate”. Pautz will explain that there are alternative concepts for reactors, which not only use uranium and thorium resources far more sparingly, but also largely avoid the generation of long-lived radiotoxic waste. The seminar will be given in German in the Ludwig-Erhard-Saal of the Ifo Institute and will be livestreamed via the internet on the CESifo web site. It is scheduled to begin at 6.00 p.m.
Contrary to standard microeconomic principles, it is by now well understood that income is not fungible. For example, the label of a government transfer can induce individuals to make expenditure decisions that are skewed towards the label. In Ifo Working Paper No. 163 Timo Hener shows that child benefits are disproportionately used for savings assignable to children. His results suggest a significant positive labeling effect on longterm savings. However the labeling effect is weak when looking at consumption goods.
Using firm-level survey data for the West German manufacturing sector, Rüdiger Bachmann and Peter Zorn in CESifo Working Paper No. 4218 revisit the technology-driven business cycle hypothesis for the case of aggregate investment. They construct a survey-based measure of technology shocks to gauge their contribution to short run investment fluctuations. They find evidence for technology shocks explaining a significant fraction of the fluctuations of aggregate investment growth. However, the larger part must be attributed to finance and demand shocks.
Heightened inflation uncertainty can have subsequent economic costs. Uncertainty distorts the signaling effect of price systems and makes stability-oriented monetary policy more difficult to implement. In CESifo Working Paper 4194 Steffen Henzel and Elisabeth Wieland look at the question of whether there is an international intertwining of inflation uncertainty in the G7 states. They show that inflation uncertainty is internationally synchronized and that the linkage grows even higher over time. Moreover, an international component can be identified that exercises a decisive influence over national inflation uncertainty in G7 states.

